Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Paul Woerner vs Mirza Basic Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Woerner vs Basic analysis and find out who is favored!
Paul Woerner vs Mirza Basic Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Woerner has won 42.32% of points on his second serve, while Basic has won 54.03%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Woerner, in recent form, has won 50.26% of his opponent's second serve points, while Basic has won 49.6%. The same stats for first serve returns are 37.62% and 30.92% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Woerner has saved 56.84% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Basic has saved 53.95% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Woerner has won 37.78% of matches played (W/L 17/ 28), with Basic winning 57.14% (W/L 24/ 18) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Woerner has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 57% (W/L 236/ 177), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 41% (W/L 12/ 17). Basic has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 58% (W/L 140/ 102), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 41% (W/L 14/ 20).
- Player level: In the last year, Woerner has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 37.78% of matches (W/L 17/ 28), where as Basic has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 63.33% of matches (W/L 19/ 11). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Woerner has played against opponents with an average rank of 168.67 while Basic has played against players with an average rank of 262.67.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Woerner has won 83% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Basic has won 38% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Woerner has converted 41.72% of breakpoint opportunities, and Basic has converted 38.21% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Woerner 0 - 0 Basic
900
Rank
644
High
27
Age
R
Plays
0
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
699
Rank
74
High
32
Age
R
Plays
W
W
L
L
L
L
W
L
L
L
Form
L
W
W
W
L
W
L
W
L
W
54% (290-248)
Career Total W/L
56% (468-364)
45% (9-11)
YTD W/L
55% (11-9)
$0
Career Prize Money
$478,883
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
No H2H Matches Available
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Paul Woerner | Mirza Basic |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 45% (9/11) | 55% (11/9) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 43% (19/25) | 57% (24/18) |
| Games Win/Loss | 48% (203/216) | 52% (220/202) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 50% (3/3) | 0% (0/2) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 43% (6/8) | 55% (6/5) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 71% (5/2) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.22 | 0.36 |
| Aces Total | 44 | 73 |
| DFs per game | 0.29 | 0.13 |
| DFs Total | 59 | 27 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:41:18 | 1:36:43 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 103.4 | 89.1 |
| 1st Serve % | 66% (808/1231) | 68% (880/1289) |
| 1st Serve W% | 61% (490/808) | 71% (622/880) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 43% (180/423) | 54% (221/409) |
| BPs Won% Total | 40% (52/130) | 38% (47/123) |
| Return Pts W% | 42% (511/1209) | 38% (525/1396) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/2) |
| Futures W/L | 45% (9/11) | 61% (11/7) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 47% (9/19) | 50% (9/18) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/3) | 25% (2/8) |
| Deciding Set W% | 100% (3/3) | 0% (0/4) |
| 1st set W, W | 86% (7/6) | 79% (14/11) |
| 1st set W, L | 14% (7/1) | 21% (14/3) |
| 1st set L, W | 23% (13/3) | 0% (6/0) |
Paul Woerner Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats 
Luca Wiedenmann
Player
Paul Woerner
51%
(
33 of
65)
1st Serve %
58%
(
32 of
55)
1
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
6
73%
(
24 of
33)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
19 of
32)
59%
(
19 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
8 of
23)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
7)
34%
(
22 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
28 of
55)
71
Total Points Won
49
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Kuzey Cekirge
Player
Paul Woerner
66%
(
63 of
96)
1st Serve %
81%
(
73 of
90)
-
Aces
-
3
Double Faults
3
52%
(
33 of
63)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
31 of
73)
45%
(
15 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
6 of
17)
56%
(
9 of
16)
Break Points Won
54%
(
7 of
13)
50%
(
48 of
96)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
53 of
90)
101
Total Points Won
85
|
4-6 7-5 4-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Khumoun Sultanov
Player
Paul Woerner
61%
(
48 of
79)
1st Serve %
77%
(
47 of
61)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
50%
(
24 of
48)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
24 of
47)
65%
(
20 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
5 of
14)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
44%
(
35 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
32 of
61)
76
Total Points Won
64
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Paul Woerner
Player
Markus Molder
70%
(
33 of
47)
1st Serve %
61%
(
35 of
57)
1
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
1
61%
(
20 of
33)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
15 of
35)
50%
(
7 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
7 of
22)
70%
(
7 of
10)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
43%
(
20 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
35 of
57)
62
Total Points Won
42
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Neil Oberleitner
Player
Paul Woerner
64%
(
34 of
53)
1st Serve %
65%
(
37 of
57)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
65%
(
22 of
34)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
16 of
37)
53%
(
10 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
5 of
20)
58%
(
7 of
12)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
40%
(
21 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
36 of
57)
68
Total Points Won
42
|
6-1 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Milos Karol
Player
Paul Woerner
55%
(
37 of
67)
1st Serve %
71%
(
55 of
78)
3
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
3
73%
(
27 of
37)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
34 of
55)
57%
(
17 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
10 of
23)
27%
(
3 of
11)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
34%
(
23 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
34 of
78)
78
Total Points Won
67
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Ha Minh Duc Vu
Player
Paul Woerner
69%
(
57 of
83)
1st Serve %
56%
(
29 of
52)
1
Aces
6
0
Double Faults
6
72%
(
41 of
57)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
22 of
29)
50%
(
13 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
9%
(
1 of
11)
35%
(
29 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
21 of
52)
75
Total Points Won
60
|
7-6(5) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Orel Kimhi
Player
Paul Woerner
61%
(
28 of
46)
1st Serve %
54%
(
43 of
79)
0
Aces
6
3
Double Faults
8
71%
(
20 of
28)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
28 of
43)
67%
(
12 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
12 of
36)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
30%
(
14 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
39 of
79)
71
Total Points Won
54
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Paul Woerner
Player
Boris Pokotilov
64%
(
49 of
77)
1st Serve %
53%
(
33 of
62)
10
Aces
7
5
Double Faults
5
73%
(
36 of
49)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
25 of
33)
54%
(
15 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
15 of
29)
50%
(
1 of
2)
Break Points Won
10%
(
1 of
10)
34%
(
26 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
22 of
62)
73
Total Points Won
66
|
4-6 6-4 10-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Paul Woerner
Player
Aaron Cohen
55%
(
34 of
62)
1st Serve %
53%
(
33 of
62)
8
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
3
71%
(
24 of
34)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
17 of
33)
46%
(
13 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
12 of
29)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
40%
(
25 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
33 of
62)
70
Total Points Won
54
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Mirza Basic Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Mirza Basic
Player
Arthur Laborde
83%
(
38 of
46)
1st Serve %
73%
(
46 of
63)
2
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
1
79%
(
30 of
38)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
31 of
46)
88%
(
7 of
8)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
7 of
17)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
20%
(
9 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
25 of
63)
62
Total Points Won
47
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Josip Simundza
Player
Mirza Basic
71%
(
92 of
129)
1st Serve %
68%
(
61 of
90)
5
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
2
65%
(
60 of
92)
1st Serve Won
79%
(
48 of
61)
54%
(
20 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
13 of
29)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
13%
(
2 of
16)
38%
(
49 of
129)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
29 of
90)
109
Total Points Won
110
|
3-6 7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Mirza Basic
Player
Marin Bradaric
72%
(
13 of
18)
1st Serve %
85%
(
22 of
26)
-
Aces
-
-
Double Faults
-
69%
(
9 of
13)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
12 of
22)
40%
(
2 of
5)
2nd Serve Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
39%
(
7 of
18)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
14 of
26)
25
Total Points Won
19
|
4-3 ret. | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Luka Mikrut
Player
Mirza Basic
64%
(
48 of
75)
1st Serve %
71%
(
35 of
49)
2
Aces
0
-
Double Faults
-
65%
(
31 of
48)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
19 of
35)
67%
(
18 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
64%
(
9 of
14)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
10)
35%
(
26 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
21 of
49)
70
Total Points Won
54
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Mirza Basic
Player
Alen Bill
71%
(
24 of
34)
1st Serve %
51%
(
26 of
51)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
5
75%
(
18 of
24)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
11 of
26)
70%
(
7 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
9 of
25)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
26%
(
9 of
34)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
31 of
51)
56
Total Points Won
29
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Neil Oberleitner
Player
Mirza Basic
70%
(
77 of
110)
1st Serve %
65%
(
81 of
124)
7
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
0
78%
(
60 of
77)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
47 of
81)
39%
(
13 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
65%
(
28 of
43)
11%
(
1 of
9)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
34%
(
37 of
110)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
49 of
124)
122
Total Points Won
112
|
6-3 3-6 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Mirza Basic
Player
Sean Hess
71%
(
45 of
63)
1st Serve %
74%
(
40 of
54)
2
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
2
80%
(
36 of
45)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
23 of
40)
44%
(
8 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
6 of
14)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
30%
(
19 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
25 of
54)
69
Total Points Won
48
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Mirza Basic
Player
Mili Poljicak
70%
(
61 of
87)
1st Serve %
61%
(
45 of
74)
2
Aces
7
0
Double Faults
2
75%
(
46 of
61)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
32 of
45)
58%
(
15 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
76%
(
22 of
29)
100%
(
1 of
1)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
6)
30%
(
26 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
27%
(
20 of
74)
81
Total Points Won
80
|
7-6(11) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Mirza Basic
Player
Marino Jakic
68%
(
52 of
76)
1st Serve %
51%
(
49 of
96)
1
Aces
7
3
Double Faults
3
75%
(
39 of
52)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
35 of
49)
63%
(
15 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
23 of
47)
18%
(
2 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
29%
(
22 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
38 of
96)
92
Total Points Won
80
|
7-5 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Jakub Nicod
Player
Mirza Basic
65%
(
33 of
51)
1st Serve %
70%
(
46 of
66)
5
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
3
85%
(
28 of
33)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
30 of
46)
72%
(
13 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
9 of
20)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
20%
(
10 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
27 of
66)
68
Total Points Won
49
|
6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
view more
Woerner Vs Basic Prediction H2H Images To Share
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Mirza Basic
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
